Immunophenotyping Results from Flow Cytometric Analysis of Children with Acute Leukemia in Ahwaz Province
Abstract
Introduction: Acute leukemia is the most common malignancy in children and acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) accounts for 75% of acute leukemia cases. New treatment protocols have resulted in complete remission rates up to nearly 100% in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Today, one of the most important prognostic factors in acute lymphoblastic leukemia is intensity of the treatment. Risk stratification is accomplished based on clinical, morphological, immune-phenotypic and cytogenetic findings. The aim of this study was to determine some prognostic factors in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia.Methods: In this retrospective study information about age at onset of acute leukemia, sex, initial white blood cell count, FAB-subtype, immunophenotype, and clinical course of newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukemia were extracted from medical records of children admitted to pediatric oncology department of Shafa Hospital between 2011 and 2012.Results: There were 21 male patients (51.2%) and 20 were female patients (48.8%). The mean age was 4.2 ± 6.34 years, and 24 patients (58.5%) had Arab origins, while 17 patients (41.5%) were of non-Arab ethnicity. Age distribution showed higher incidence of ALL in younger children: 1-4 years 47.5%, 5-9 years 27.5% and 25% in patients >10 years.L2 subtype was more common in our patients 51.2% while L1 subtype was reported 46.3%.Only one patient was reported to be L3 subtype (2.4%), yet we did not detect any significant relation between different age groups and trend for incidence for specific subtype. The number of white blood cell (WBC) at the time of admission was reported as: less than 10,000 cells/cm in 30%, between11-50,000 in 37.5% and >50,000 in 32.5% patients .Organ involvement was present in 47.5%, and central nervous involvement, ( proved by positive malignant cells in CSF fluid) was detected in 4.9% of our patients. In our study, HLA-DR was 62.5 % in ALL patients and CD 20 and CD19 was the most common marker in these patients. In our work the most common markers in L1, which was found in 19 patients were reported CD 19, CD33, CD22, CD35, CD20 and CD9. Also the percentage of markers in L2 subtype had a similarity to L1 group.Conclusions: Conclusion: In this study, FAB-subtype L1 was less than previous studies, while FAB-subtype L2 and pre-B cell immunophenotype was more common than previous studies. Other results were the same as reported in older studies.Pui CH. Childhood Leukemias. N Engl J Med .1995; 332, 1618-1630.
Parkin DM, Stiller CA, Draper GJ, Bieber CA. The international in- cidence of childhood cancer. Int J Cancer. 1988 Oct 15; 42(4):511-20.
Pui CH, Schrappe M, Ribeiro RC, Niemeyer CM. Childhood and adolescent lymphoid and myeloid leukemia. Hematology Am SocHe- matolEduc Program. 2004:118-45.
Löwenberg B, Downing JR, Burnett A. Acute myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med 1999; 341, 1051–1062.
McNally RJ, Alexander FE, Birch JM (2002). Space-time clustering analyses of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia by immunophe- notype. Br J Cancer, 87, 513-5.
http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/pdq/treatment/adultAML/health- professional/page2
Devine S., and Larson R., (1994) - Acute Leukemia in Adults: Recent Developments in Diagnosis and Treatment. C A- J Clin, Vol.44, No.6, P. 326 – 352
McKenna R., (2000) - Multifaceted Approach to the Diagnosis and Classification of Acute Leukemia’s. Am Asso for ClinChem, Vol .46, P.1252-1259.
Slobinas A., and Matuzevièienë R., (2005) - The immunophenotype of adults with acute myeloid leukemia: proposal of prognostic value. ActaMedicaLituanica, Vol. 12, No. 3, P. 54–59.
Rezaei A., Adib M., Mokarian F., Tebianian M., and Nassiri R., (2003) - Leukemia Markers Expression of Peripheral Blood vs. Bone Marrow Blasts using Flow cytometry. Med SciMonit, Vol.9, No. 8, P.359-362.
Basso G., Lanza F., Orfao A., Bene M., BorowitzM., CampanaD.,et al., ( 2002) - Flow CytometrycImmunophenotyping of Acute Lympho- blastic Leukemia is the Time Ready for Consensus Guidelines?. J Biol- RegulHomeost Agents, Vol.16, P. 257-258.
hianese R., Brando B., and Gratama J., (2002) - Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of Flow Cytometric Immunophenotyping in Malig- nant Hematological Diseases. J BiolRegulHomeost Agents, Vol.16, P. 259-269.
Kaleem Z., Crawford E., Pathan M., Jasper L., CovinskyM.,Johnson L., et al., (2003) - Flow Cytometric Analysis of Acute Leukemia’s. Arch Pathol Lab Med, Vol. 127, No. 1, P. 42–48.
Immunophenotypic subtyping of leukemic cells from Iranian pa- tients with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: association to disease out- come.AsgarianOmran H, Shabani M, Shahrestani T, Sarafnejad A, Khoshnoodi J, Vossough P, Faranoush M, Sharifian RA, Jeddi-Tehrani M, Rabbani H, ShokriF.Iran J Immunol. 2007 Mar; 4(1):15-25.
Immunophenotyping of Leukemia in Children, Gorgan, Iran. NB Mirbehbahani , A Rashidbaghan , H Nodehi , A Jahazi , N Behnampour, M Jeihounian , Z PayabIranian Journal of pediatric oncology and hema- tology 2011, 1(4): 115-120
Draper GJ, Kroll ME, Stiller CA. Childhood Cancer. Cancer Surv 1994; 307: 493-517.
Gurney J.G, Daris S, Severson RF, Fang JY, Ross JA, Robinson LL. Trends in Cancer incidence among children in US. Cancer 1996; 78: 532-41. 18. Greaves MF. Aetiology of acute Leukaemia. The Lancet 1997; 349: 344-9.
Files | ||
Issue | Vol 6 No 3 (2014) | |
Section | Original Articles | |
Keywords | ||
Acute Leukemia Children Immuno-phenotyping Flow cytometry |
Rights and permissions | |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |